192 twin birth records n hampshire
Associates National Bank D. As a consequence, some Spanish-language applicants were denied credit on a discriminatory basis. The United States also claimed that approved Spanish-language UNOCAL applicants were given lower credit line assignments than applicants processed through the English-language decision system. Finally, we contended that the bank offered different promotional credit services to those who applied through the Spanish-language system from those commonly offered to other customers.
The United States estimate that as a result of ANB's actions, approximately 1, Hispanic applicants and customers who utilized ANB's Spanish-language applications were adversely affected. Any funds remaining after all claims have been paid will be used for consumer education in Hispanic communities. This is the first fair lending case brought by the Department of Justice alleging discrimination in connection with credit cards. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency referred this matter to us. United States and State of North Carolina v.
Auto Fare, Inc. The lawsuit seeks a court order directing the defendants to retrofit these buildings to make them accessible to people with disabilities, to make changes to policies and procedures, and to compensate individuals who suffered discrimination due to the inaccessible conditions. Autumn Ridge Condominium Association, Inc. On October 22, , the court entered a consent order in United States v. The complaint , filed on July 14, , alleged that the Condominium Association and the members of its Board of Directors in located in Munster, Indiana, maintained a written policy that prohibited families with minor children from living in the condominium complex The complaint further alleged that members of the Board made oral statements indicating a preference against families with children and that the policy was enforced in a discriminatory manner to exclude African-Americans from living in the condominium complex.
NEW ZEALAND LAW COMMISSION - 4. Surrogacy
The consent order also provides for extensive injunctive relief, including fair housing training, reporting requirements, and the resignation of the president of the condominium board. Avatar Properties, Inc. Bank of America N. Bank of America Corp. Bernard L. On April 1, , the court entered a consent order resolving United States v.
Bernard, L. The complaint , filed on April 15, , alleged a pattern or practice of race discrimination by the owners of apartments in Chalmette, Louisiana. Specifically, the complaint alleged the owners and managers of the Foster Apartments, either turned away black testers or steered them to an apartment building in a black neighborhood while encouraging whites to rent their other properties.
The four-year decree also provides for monitoring of the defendants' operation of their business, requires them to undergo training, and imposes restrictions on any subsequent buyer of the rental properties. On March 8, , the United States filed a consent order along with the complaint in United States v.
Badeen D. The complaint alleged that the defendants, the owners and managers of Joe's nightclub, one of the largest night clubs in Wichita, Kansas which was formerly known as Acapulco Joe's, discriminated against Latino and African American patrons and potential patrons. In the consent order, the defendants admit that African American and Latino individuals were wrongly excluded from the club. In addition to prohibiting future discrimination, the consent order requires the defendants to modify its admission and ID checking policies, train employees, advertise its new procedures and nondiscrimination policies in English and Spanish, and document its compliance efforts.
BancorpSouth Bank N. The United States filed this case after a determination by the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] that reasonable cause existed to believe that Bank United discriminated against a loan applicant and her children on the basis of disability. The complaint contended that the bank requested information from the applicant concerning the nature and severity of their disabilities when she sought a mortgage loan.
On May 9, , the court entered a consent decree in United States v. Barnason S. The complaint , filed on on April 20, , alleged that the managers and owner of three residential apartment buildings in Manhattan engaged in a pattern or practice of sexual harassment of female tenants in violation of Fair Housing Act. Defendant Barnason is a Level 3 sex offender who was hired after being released from prison for various sexual offenses.
This is the largest award ever recovered in a sexual harassment suit brought by the United States under the Fair Housing Act. Also under the decree, the building manager who engaged in the most severe of the harassing conduct is permanently enjoined from having any involvement in the management or maintenance of occupied rental housing property.
The United States filed a fair housing election complaint alleging that the defendants discriminated against the complainant and her son on the basis of their familial status, by refusing to rent an apartment and falsely telling her that an apartment was not available. Defendants own a single-family home in Cheyenne, Wyoming, as well as a number of other small rental properties in that area. Additional relief includes: an injunction prohibiting discriminatory housing practices by the defendants in the future; mandatory fair housing training for Mr.
Barone and his employees; and an agreement that Ms.
Barone will withdraw from the management of rental properties. On October 22, , the court Lawson, J. Barrett M. The Division's complaint , filed October 9, , alleged that John Barrett, an Athens, Georgia apartment-complex owner and developer, violated the Fair Housing Act by failing to construct accessible housing in seven apartment complexes which he owns and operates.
In addition to Mr. Barrett, the complaint named several companies with which he is associated as defendants in the lawsuit. Three of the apartment complexes are located in Athens, Georgia; two are located in Statesboro, Georgia; and one is located in Greenville, North Carolina.
All Public Member Trees results for Alberta Stedwell
By signing the decree, the defendants admitted their failure to design and construct the subject properties in compliance with the requirements of the Fair Housing Act. The consent decree requires Mr. Barrett and his companies over the next 15 months over the next 15 months to retrofit the public and common use areas of the seven complexes and of the individual apartments units to make them accessible to persons with disabilities. Among the features which will be retrofitted are bedroom and bathroom doors which are too narrow to accommodate persons who use wheelchairs; clear floor space in bathrooms that is inadequate for use by persons in wheelchairs; and excessive sloping of the pavement leading up to dwelling unit entrances as well as the thresholds to those entrances which makes it difficult for persons who use wheelchairs to enter units.
On August 23, , the court entered a consent order in United States v. Bathrick D.
The United States' complaint , which was filed on December 19, , alleged that Ronald Bathrick engaged in discrimination on the basis of sex, including severe, pervasive, and unwelcome sexual harassment in rental units he owned and managed in Hastings and St. Paul, Minnesota. The complaint was originally brought to the Division's attention through a private local attorney. The complaint alleges that Bay View discriminates on the basis of religion by prohibiting non-Christians from becoming members of the Association and owning homes in the Bay View community, a summer resort on Little Traverse Bay in Emmet County, Michigan.
The settlement requires that Bay View amend its bylaws, articles of association, and membership application materials to eliminate the religious restriction on membership.
Archive:Boston, Massachusetts, Vital Records
The case was originally referred to the Division after the Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD received several complaints, conducted an investigation and issued charges of discrimination. The court entered the consent decree on July 18, Enterprises, Inc. On May 2, , the court entered a consent order in United States v. The complaint, which was filed on December 10, , and amended on November 2, , alleged that a towing company in Norfolk, Virginia towed and sold a Navy Lieutenant's car without a court order, in violation of the SCRA.
The complaint also alleged that the defendants may have towed and sold at least twenty servicemembers' cars without court orders. On November 6, , the court issued an order on summary judgment resolving "a question of first impression" by adopting the United States' position that Section of the SCRA is a strict liability statute and finding that servicemembers need not notify towing companies of their active duty status in order to benefit from the SCRA's protections. The court rejected defendants' arguments that it is impractical to verify a vehicle owner's military status and ruled that, "even if the defendants exercised the utmost care in investigating their victims' military status, they face liability for their actions.
On December 2, , the court entered a consent decree resolving United States v.
Beaudet D. The Defendant, David R. Beaudet, has owned and managed numerous single-family rental homes throughout St. Paul since The complaint , filed February 19, , alleged that Beaudet subjected female tenants to severe, pervasive, and unwelcome sexual harassment. Specifically, the complaint alleged that he subjected female tenants to unwanted sexual touching and advances, conditioned the terms of women's tenancy on the granting of sexual favors, and entered the apartments of female tenants without permission or notice.
He has also agreed to hire a management company to manage his rental properties. Bedford Development S. Belshaw C. The complaint , which was filed on April 10, , alleged that a California landlord violated the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act SCRA when he refused to return pet and key deposits to a United States Air Force Lieutenant after he lawfully terminated his lease prior to move-in upon receipt of military orders requiring him to relocate to Texas.
Discovering our Douglas Ancestors and their Relatives
Bensalem Township E. On September 1, , the parties entered a settlement agreement in United States v. As part of the agreement, Bensalem Township, Pennsylvania will permit the Bensalem Masjid, a Muslim nonprofit religious organization, to use its property for the purpose of building a mosque. The complaint , which was filed on July 21, , alleged that the Township violated the substantial burden, equal terms, nondiscrimination, and unreasonable limitations provisions of RLUIPA by denying the Bensalem Masjid a use variance to build a mosque on its property.
The complaint also alleged that the Township only permitted places of worship on properties zoned as part of the Institutional District, and no properties with that zoning designation were available in that district when the Bensalem Masjid acquired the property. Bernards Township D. Biafora's Inc. Big D Enterprises, Inc.
The United States had filed this case after a determination by the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] that reasonable cause existed to believe that the defendants refused to rent to an African American household. Our complaint , filed on March 13, , added a claim that this refusal to rent to black persons was part of a pattern or practice of racial discrimination in rentals.
- phone number search with and address;
- 1910 Federal Population Censuses - Part 3.
- public records search duval county florida.
- how do i find my family tree for free?
- are nc arrest reports public record.
- Did we grab two identical cars? You could be forgiven for thinking so!
The defendants appealed the jury verdict and the district court's injunction prohibiting the defendants from engaging in future acts of discrimination.